Worked examples
Mid-size DTC catalog
| Active SKUs | 200 |
| Annual consumption value | $500,000.00 |
| A-class share of SKUs | 20% |
| B-class share of SKUs | 30% |
| A-class SKUs | 40 |
| B-class SKUs | 60 |
| C-class SKUs | 100 |
| Value in A-class (~80%) | $400,000.00 |
40 A-SKUs carry ~$400,000: count them weekly, never let them stock out.
Long-tail marketplace seller
| Active SKUs | 500 |
| Annual consumption value | $1,200,000.00 |
| A-class share of SKUs | 15% |
| B-class share of SKUs | 25% |
| A-class SKUs | 75 |
| B-class SKUs | 125 |
| C-class SKUs | 300 |
| Value in A-class (~80%) | $960,000.00 |
A tighter A-cut: 75 SKUs holding ~$960,000, with 300 C-SKUs on autopilot.
Frequently asked questions
How does the ABC inventory split translate into policy?
Each class gets a different level of effort. A-items: cycle count weekly or monthly, hold generous safety stock, reorder from real forecasts, and negotiate hard with suppliers. B-items: standard reorder points, quarterly review. C-items: simple min/max rules, annual counts, minimal or zero buffer, and ruthless pruning of ones that stop selling. The payoff is focus — tight control where 80% of the money is, cheap automation everywhere else.
Is the 80/15/5 value split exact?
No — it is the classic Pareto pattern, and this calculator uses it as an estimate. Real catalogs run anywhere from 70/20/10 to 90/8/2 depending on how head-heavy your sales are. The class boundaries are also yours to draw: this tool defaults to 20/30/50 of SKUs but lets you tighten the A-cut. Treat the output as a sizing guide, then rank your actual SKUs by annual COGS to draw the real lines.
How often should I redo the ABC classification?
Twice a year for most stores, quarterly if your catalog turns over quickly with launches and discontinuations. Products migrate: last year’s A-item bestseller fades to B, a new launch rockets into A within a quarter, and seasonal SKUs can be A-class in Q4 and C-class in July. A stale classification quietly gives your best sellers C-item treatment, which is how top SKUs end up stocking out.
Should I use revenue, COGS, or profit to rank SKUs?
Annual consumption value — units sold × unit cost (COGS) — is the textbook basis because inventory control is about the money tied up in stock. But running the analysis a second time on contribution profit is revealing: a high-revenue, thin-margin SKU may deserve less buffer cash than the ranking suggests, while a modest seller with fat margins earns A-class protection. Where the two rankings disagree is exactly where judgment beats the formula.
Related calculators
- EOQ Calculator
- Reorder Point Calculator
- Safety Stock Calculator
- Break-even ROAS Calculator
- All calculators
Part of the Inventory collection.